Author Topic: Preheat VS Rapid start  (Read 662 times)
TiCoune66
Sr. Member
****

Karma: 32
Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 388


Frost PH ballasts, surely the best ones I've seen!


Preheat VS Rapid start « on: October 10, 2008, 08:28:02 PM »
Which starting method gives the highest life at fluorescent lamps?
Logged

I'm also known as Vince the fox.

---

I still use old lighting technology, it has absolutely no environmental impact, because my house is fed by hydroelectricity. ^_^

don93s
Full Member
***

Karma: 58
Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 196



Re: Preheat VS Rapid start « Reply #1 on: October 11, 2008, 09:04:16 PM »
On the smaller wattage, i.e. up to 20w, I've noticed that lamps with trigger start (aka rapid start for smaller wattage) ballasts seem to last longer in most cases with the fixtures I've used. Of course, it will depend how often they are switched on/off, but they seem to last twice as long as preheat...for the 120v reactors. The F40 seem about the same as I've seen on the fixtures at work.
Logged
arcblue
Full Member
***

Karma: 13
Offline

Posts: 109



Re: Preheat VS Rapid start « Reply #2 on: November 06, 2008, 10:33:14 PM »
From what I have read by ballast manufacturers and in other articles, programmed start (electrodes heated before start & then shut off) gives the highest lamp life, followed by rapid start, preheat, and then instant-start. However, if a lamp is lit once and then lit continuously until it fails, I would imagine instant start ballasts would give a longer life because the high OCV would keep the lamp going until the electrodes melt and the lamp loses vaccuum, whereas on other types of ballasts, the lamp would go out when the ballast can no longer supply the voltage needed to keep a steady discharge.
Logged

I'm lampin...

TiCoune66
Sr. Member
****

Karma: 32
Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 388


Frost PH ballasts, surely the best ones I've seen!


Re: Preheat VS Rapid start « Reply #3 on: November 09, 2008, 10:28:05 AM »
Thanks for the infos!
Logged

I'm also known as Vince the fox.

---

I still use old lighting technology, it has absolutely no environmental impact, because my house is fed by hydroelectricity. ^_^

Aaron Walker
Guest
Re: Preheat VS Rapid start « Reply #4 on: September 07, 2009, 10:05:24 PM »
actually i think programed start would make the lamp last the longest instant start would not provide sufficient cathode heat causing it to slowly sputter away and fail after 5 years. ive witnesed it happen.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print