Looks like an effort to reduce the amount of mercury floating around, rather than additional energy efficiency improvements. Not surprising in the least; it's been an increasing trend in the last years.Why not to ban tuna because it contains way more mercury than fluorescent and HID lamps...
And with initatives like the National strategy for lamps containing mercury, vintage lighting equipment is going to disappear FAST.
At least they make it sorta-kinda clear that ownership is not covered by these regulations. But even if it eventually were, my incandescent lamps don't contain any mercury so who's laughing now!
I'd be careful with any sale involving bulbs crossing the border though, even on auction sites and the like. Buying a lamp covered by regulation from outside Canada and having it shipped to a Canadian location makes the buyer an importer, legally speaking. While it's true that a single lamp may not even draw any attention and slip right through, the buyer is still technically in violation. That's playing with fire really. Bonus points if it says right on the customs declaration "MERCURY LAMP". I would certainly not take that risk personally, I would rather pull the plug on this whole lamp collecting business. Wait, I already kinda did, so never mind LOL.
And what about other way more poisoning materials that used to make LED lamps that aren't used to make fluorescent and HID lamps?
LED lamp manufacturing producing much more mercury than fluorescent and HID lamps manufacturing, as well as other poisoning metals that aren't emitted from regular lamp manufacturing.
There were also mercury free HPS lamps, which are only very slightly less efficient than regular HPS lamps.
What a BS all of these thing that politics wants to do with the regular lighting.