Author Topic: 400W MH lamp Bursts and Keeps Running!  (Read 167 times)
Multisubject
Member
*****
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


WWW
400W MH lamp Bursts and Keeps Running! « on: February 05, 2026, 09:29:17 AM » Author: Multisubject
Just saw this video, very very interesting to see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Med6Rkl3eNA
Logged

"The only stupid question is the one left unasked"
Public Lamp Spec Sheet

Ash
Member
*****
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


Re: 400W MH lamp Bursts and Keeps Running! « Reply #1 on: February 06, 2026, 11:18:50 AM » Author: Ash
At and after the moment of burst, the existing hot spot is still on the electrodes inside the arctube, not on the external conductors and frame. So the cloud of thermal emission of electrons and consequently path of least Vdrop is between the electrodes in the arctube, and the arc keeps burning there

The pressure in the arctube must have been extreme, if even after the gas volume expands to the whole outer (and pressure drops accordingly) it still keeps a high intensity discharge. This probably would not happen if running on the correct gear
Logged
Multisubject
Member
*****
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


WWW
Re: 400W MH lamp Bursts and Keeps Running! « Reply #2 on: February 06, 2026, 12:22:31 PM » Author: Multisubject
I found it very cool that the pressure was allowed to decrease so much, but the electrodes were still kept hot enough to function as they normally would. It would be cool to see this started again and see the discharge that would likely occur between the support structures
Logged

"The only stupid question is the one left unasked"
Public Lamp Spec Sheet

Ash
Member
*****
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


Re: 400W MH lamp Bursts and Keeps Running! « Reply #3 on: February 06, 2026, 12:52:14 PM » Author: Ash
The actual lamp power may be different from the rating. See if you can find the real lamp power, or if it lines up better if you assume something like 39W instead of 35W for the lamp. (This still have to be verified, but lets see if this would explain anything)

The formula used is correct for Xbal, not for Zbal. They are not too much far away from each other, this alone would not likely cause as high differences as you see. Unless you have a formula that can account for Xbal and Rbal separately, use Xbal and disregard Rbal
Logged
Print 
© 2005-2026 Lighting-Gallery.net | SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies