Author Topic: Why were MH street lights so uncommon?  (Read 14 times)
Lightingeye60
Member
***
Online

View Posts
View Gallery

Why were MH street lights so uncommon? « on: Today at 07:12:57 PM » Author: Lightingeye60
What I’ve noticed, is that metal halide lights are WAY less common than HPS or mercury vapor offerings for city-owned streets. I was never sure why. Metal halide puts out a much better light quality than HPS. MH is my favorite HID source and I wish they became standard on streets rather than HPS. I’m not a fan of clear mercury either but I even like those better than HPS.

I get that they don’t last as long as MV or HPS, but they look good and they actually are a white light. MH NEMA heads and MH coach style lanterns or UFO style posr tops also seem rare. Now, LED has taken over, and quality LEDs have even better light quality than MH. HPS made visibly on roads worse, and they also were a very warm color which wasn’t the most appropriate for a street.

The only time you’d find an MH cobra or post top was in cities that refused to use HPS (like Charleston, SC) or in upscale parts of a city. MH NEMA heads are pretty much non-existent, and only Cooper made them.

Shoeboxes, floodlights, decorative teardrop lights, and acorns seem to be an exception, as they’re all common in MH. Wall packs, bay lights, grow lights, and recessed cans don’t count as they’re not street lights.
Logged
Lcubed3
Member
***
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

MAXIMUM LUMENS!!!


Re: Why were MH street lights so uncommon? « Reply #1 on: Today at 07:52:16 PM » Author: Lcubed3
Because they have lower efficiency and frequently explode at EOL. Just imagine maintaining thousands upon thousands
of MH fixtures. You will need many more spare parts for all the shattered refractors and dented reflectors.
Logged

Portland General Electric: 120/240VAC @ 60Hz
Bringer of Light

Print 
© 2005-2026 Lighting-Gallery.net | SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies