Author Topic: Workhorse LPS Question  (Read 940 times)
NeXe Lights
Member
***
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

Quality Lighting Inc. Design 114-24B


Workhorse LPS Question « on: September 28, 2025, 01:56:36 PM » Author: NeXe Lights
Should I use one or two red wires on a Workhorse 3 to run an 18W SOX bulb? I'm asking because most people say to use two red wires. However, an 18W SOX lamp is most similar in electrical characteristics to a 24" F20T12 fluorescent tube, and Fulham's website says to use only one red wire for an F20T12 tube. So which is it? One or two red wires? If it is two, please explain why.
Logged

“Beware the barrenness of a busy life.” Socrates

Multisubject
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

All lights are created equal


Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #1 on: September 28, 2025, 07:55:37 PM » Author: Multisubject
According to Fulham spec sheets, a WH3 ballast runs a F20T12 lamp at 94% power with one wire connected (almost perfect). Considering that an 18W SOX lamp runs at roughly the same specs (slightly less rated current), then connecting one wire is almost certainly the right way to do it. Connecting two wires would probably be pretty bad. I would expect an 18W SOX lamp to be slightly overdriven, maybe 105% power (just a guess), but overall a good match with the WH3 with one wire connected. I definitely wouldn't do both wires, but maybe there is something I am missing.
Logged
wide-lite 1000
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery


Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #2 on: September 28, 2025, 08:14:00 PM » Author: wide-lite 1000
https://www.lighting-gallery.net/gallery/displayimage.php?album=5203&pos=7&pid=253533
Logged

Collector,Hoarder,Pack-rat! Clear mercury Rules!!

RRK
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery
Roman


Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #3 on: September 28, 2025, 11:13:50 PM » Author: RRK
Well, a question no one dared to ask yet is what arc current 18W SOX needs when operated on HF. We all know that on 50/60Hz it is 0.35A, and most likely was thought to be homologated with European 230V/18W fluorescent choke impedance. But on HF *likely* SOX arc voltage drops a bit compared to line frequency operation which probably means a bit lower lamp power at 0.35A current than when run on line frequency due to lower cathode drops. For usual fluorescents this is a good thing meaning higher efficiency at the same or better light output. But SOX arctubes are heavily temperature (=power) dependent so *probably* arc current needs to be compensated (up-rated) for HF to work optimally?





« Last Edit: September 28, 2025, 11:17:11 PM by RRK » Logged
Ash
Member
*****
Offline

View Posts
View Gallery


Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #4 on: September 29, 2025, 12:28:54 PM » Author: Ash
By a factor of 2x ?
Logged
RRK
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery
Roman


Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #5 on: October 01, 2025, 01:30:47 AM » Author: RRK
Not 2x of course, but still probably lamp current needs to be somewhat compensated for HF work against its nominal value at 50/60Hz.

 
Logged
Medved
Member
*****
Offline

Gender: Male
View Posts
View Gallery

Re: Workhorse LPS Question « Reply #6 on: October 01, 2025, 03:09:18 AM » Author: Medved
The cathode drop dissipation does not affect the cold spot temperature (that is what matter to maintain the sodium vapor pressure inside), the cathodes radiate the heat only on the cap end, the rest of the tube way more follows the general anode column power density.
So from that perspective, assuming the anode column is the same for HF as for 50Hz, the current would need to stay the same 0.35A.
Logged

No more selfballasted c***

Print 
© 2005-2025 Lighting-Gallery.net | SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies